<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.futuretap.com/blog/semi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F</link>
	<description>Smart iPhone Apps</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ortwin Gentz</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-736&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Ortwin Gentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-736</guid>
		<description>Devin, yeah this time the review time was rather short (7 days).

There are several ways to find out what&#039;s in the private API: Using &quot;class-dump&quot; is one method and there are several online sources and books (for example &quot;The iPhone Developer&#039;s Cookbook&quot; by Erica Sadun) that cover this topic. I think it&#039;s harder to determine whether a project uses any private APIs. Apple doesn&#039;t publish its internal checking tool so devs have to find out themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devin, yeah this time the review time was rather short (7 days).</p>
<p>There are several ways to find out what&#8217;s in the private API: Using &#8220;class-dump&#8221; is one method and there are several online sources and books (for example &#8220;The iPhone Developer&#8217;s Cookbook&#8221; by Erica Sadun) that cover this topic. I think it&#8217;s harder to determine whether a project uses any private APIs. Apple doesn&#8217;t publish its internal checking tool so devs have to find out themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin Ross</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-735&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-735</guid>
		<description>Its cool to see Apple try to make the app store review process quicker. From my experience, the review time is getting quicker. (Maybe thats b/c I expect it to take a month to get a app approved). I&#039;ve always wondered how people find out whats in the private api. Got any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its cool to see Apple try to make the app store review process quicker. From my experience, the review time is getting quicker. (Maybe thats b/c I expect it to take a month to get a app approved). I&#8217;ve always wondered how people find out whats in the private api. Got any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ortwin Gentz</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-733&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Ortwin Gentz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-733</guid>
		<description>Andy, absolutely: http://openradar.appspot.com/7456121
Feel free to file a dupe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, absolutely: <a href="http://openradar.appspot.com/7456121" rel="nofollow">http://openradar.appspot.com/7456121</a><br />
Feel free to file a dupe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-728&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-728</guid>
		<description>I hope you&#039;ve submitted a radar if you want to see this API made public ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;ve submitted a radar if you want to see this API made public ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @piercyha</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-723&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>@piercyha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-723</guid>
		<description>RT @uliwitness: RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? http://bit.ly/5kpew5  [Oh wow. Some sense!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @uliwitness: RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? <a href="http://bit.ly/5kpew5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5kpew5</a>  [Oh wow. Some sense!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @36peas</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-724&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>@36peas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-724</guid>
		<description>RT @CocoaGeek: RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? http://bit.ly/5kpew5 &lt;&lt; process improvement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @CocoaGeek: RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? <a href="http://bit.ly/5kpew5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5kpew5</a> &lt;&lt; process improvement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @mnemonicfx</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-725&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>@mnemonicfx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-725</guid>
		<description>Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? http://bit.ly/5kpew5 (via @futuretap)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? <a href="http://bit.ly/5kpew5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5kpew5</a> (via @futuretap)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @CocoaGeek</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-726&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>@CocoaGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-726</guid>
		<description>RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? http://bit.ly/5kpew5 &lt;&lt; Isolated case or process improvement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? <a href="http://bit.ly/5kpew5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5kpew5</a> &lt;&lt; Isolated case or process improvement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @uliwitness</title>
		<link>http://futuretap.com/feeder/?FeederAction=clicked&amp;feed=Comments+on+Articles+%28RSS2%29&amp;seed=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.futuretap.com%2Fblog%2Fsemi-reject-a-new-measure-in-the-app-store-review-process%2F%23comment-727&amp;seed_title=Semi-reject%3A+a+new+measure+in+the+App+Store+Review+process%3F/comment-page-1/#comment-727</link>
		<dc:creator>@uliwitness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.futuretap.com/?p=1274#comment-727</guid>
		<description>RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? http://bit.ly/5kpew5

[Oh wow. Some sense!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RT @futuretap: Semi-reject: a new measure in the App Store Review process? <a href="http://bit.ly/5kpew5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5kpew5</a></p>
<p>[Oh wow. Some sense!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
